Although NAMI Burn-E electric scooters excel in every area, peak performance gave them the worldwide recognition they now have. Nami is the industry standard for efficiency and robustness since it corrects all the shortcomings and mistakes of other ultra-performance motorised machines in Burn-E. The scooter’s dual brushless 1500W motors produce 3000W of output power and 8400W of peak power, which is sufficient to propel it to a top speed of 60 mph. The vehicle can give a desirable maximum range of up to 100 miles because to its sizable 72V 35Ah battery.

Are you concerned about its capacity to climb hills? It will be able to easily climb incline slopes of up to 35 degrees thanks to the engine and battery combination. Electric scooter enthusiasts know how difficult it is to find scooters with such gradient-gobbling capabilities.

Burn-e offers the smoothest and most pleasant ride ever thanks to its ultra-wide, sturdy tyres and two hydraulic shock absorbers on each wheel. Riders can travel anywhere in comfort and style thanks to the combination of the suspension and tyres.

You anticipate dependable braking power from the NAMI Burn-E as befits an ultra-performance scooter of its calibre. Without a doubt, the Viper electric scooter actually outperforms expectations in this area. The scooter can be brought to a stop with the slightest pressure thanks to its precise and well calibrated rear NUTT hydraulic disc brakes and built-in electronic brakes.

Burn-E also has a high-tech dashboard that makes operating and controlling the vehicle simple. Its cutting-edge displays also let you examine, manage, and customise a variety of settings. Regular elements like speed, battery life, and distance are included, as well as complex information like cruise control, ride modes, and acceleration control.

The majority of the controversy surrounding the BURN-E stems from some shipping damage issues with the first batch sold to the US, but overall, build quality is excellent.

Although not quite as quick to fold as scooters like the Apollo Phantom, the novel stem latch is sturdy and simple to operate. The BURN-visual E’s attractiveness is centred on its carbon fibre stem, which also improves the ride-feel of the scooter.

The Ninebot Max comes to mind as an example of a scooter that is overly stiff, whereas the BURN-stem E’s flexes just so. It offers just enough give to prevent hand strain whether pulling yourself on board while using the throttle or holding on over speed bumps.

The Nutt hydraulic brakes’ brake pads are also of the highest quality and feature metal cooling fins to help them dissipate heat during furious riding. An excellent feature for a large, powerful scooter. The Wolf King’s brake rotors, which are 3mm thick, would be ideal since they would be better at resisting warping or bending under impact and the added mass would lower peak brake temperatures.

We had been looking forward to riding a scooter with adjustable hydraulic suspension ever since we first learned about the BURN-E. The suspension met expectations. The shocks might use a bit more dampening, though, so the adjusters wouldn’t need to be set at 15.5 out of 16 clicks. The shocks’ length of 165 mm makes them quite normal for mountain bikes, so those wishing to upgrade may find several aftermarket options. However, the BURN-1800 E’s lb/inch spring is more than twice as strong as the usual mountain bike spring rate, so keep that in mind when looking for aftermarket shocks.

The BURN-E is the only vehicle with a hand-welded tubular aluminium exoskeleton. Michael Sha claims that although the frame is a little overbuilt, it shows during intense riding, which aids in the rider’s feet feeling firmly planted. Internal cross elements in the shape of an x reinforce the tubes themselves.

The scooter can be fully charged with the two provided 2.8 A chargers in just 6 hours, despite having the

largest battery of any scooter we’ve tested. To put that into perspective, it has exactly four times the amps of the Dualtron Storm’s default charger.

Although the BURN-E has an incredibly high water resistance rating (IP55), the real test will be after the first full winter of riding. Water always manages to amaze us in some manner. However, based on the scooter’s design, we have high hopes for its water resistance.

The sides of the charging ports are the only readily noticeable weak points. Simple sealing of them is possible with some black silicone. Although the fenders don’t appear to offer the finest protection for the rider, they performed admirably in our conventional fender test.

We were relieved to find a motorcycle-grade side stand on the BURN-E after being let down by a couple extremely well-made scooters with flimsy side supports. While pushing the scooter does have the potential to catch the rider’s ankle, it is not nearly as dangerous as the Wolf Warrior and Wolf King side stands.

The loudest horn we’ve ever tested, at 118 dB, is another motorcycle-like feature. It is positioned in an exposed area, but so does the horn on my motorcycle, and it continues to function well after 64,400 kilometres.

There are several positive aspects to this scooter’s design. So what is there to dislike? We’d like to see the following things changed:

• less dead space while using the throttle
• Stronger steering stops are needed to prevent bending or breaking.
• more effective power port backside sealing
• Adjustable headlight that may be made without tools
• To lessen the chance of damage when folding the scooter, the brake cord might be a little longer.

The manner the scooter is shipped is one aspect of quality that has already been improved. Some units, including ours, that were shipped to the United States experienced shipping problems, which ranged from bent rotors to bent stem locks that prevented the stem from engaging. Currently, pallets with straps are used to carry U.S. units, which has almost prevented shipping damage.

Control is essential to power. The ability to wield a horrifying amount of power in an almost casual manner is what makes the BURN-E so unique.

The fact that the throttles on the fastest scooters feel like they are on a hair trigger and that the slightest input at the throttle causes the scooter to jolt forward is one of the most prevalent complaints about them.

It’s simple to ride the BURN-E gently and leisurely or recklessly without changing performance settings.

It’s absolutely not ideal that there is a dead zone at the start of the throttle. The dead area is eliminated, though, if you secure your thumb on the housing and rock it toward the throttle. Another benefit of anchoring is that you can manage the throttle with three times as much precision as if you were to keep your thumb free while pressing the throttle.

together with the gradual, smooth throttle. This powerful scooter is simple to control to perform exactly what you want it to do thanks to the adjustable hydraulic suspension and big deck.

The suspension felt excellent right out of the box, but we did find that the steering might waver uncomfortably if we increased the pace and then reduced the gas. We made the decision to apply certain traditional motorcycle roadracing set up techniques in order to increase the high speed stability.

The first step was to reduce the steering angle, which increases trail and strengthens the front end. To do this, we changed the preload on the front spring by two full turns while removing one full turn from the preload on the rear spring.

We moved on to damping after we had increased the steering angle. Since the shocks are under-damped when they are supplied, road imperfections might cause the scooter to oscillate. We were able to settle the suspension and improve the way the tyres tracked the pavement by adjusting the damping at both ends to 15.5 out of 16 clicks.

In order to create a broader, more blunt contact patch and decrease the steering, we reduced tyre pressure from 50 psi to 45 psi front and rear. When we were finished, we discovered that bikers carrying

roughly 74 kg no longer experienced any wobble. A bigger preload adjustment would be preferable for larger riders. Ideally, there should be three turns in front and one turn behind. The workaround for larger riders would be to take one more turn out of the rear spring because NAMI advises against exceeding +2 turns of preload.

Given the power they can produce, the sine drive motor controllers in the BURN-E produce a ride that is remarkably quiet. The smooth beast scooter’s power-touring riding style is unquestionably enhanced by this.

It equals the Wolf King’s 3.1 m and is just 0.1 m short of the Inokim OXO’s ESG record. The suspension performs a remarkable job of keeping the scooter planted, even when switching from heavy throttle to hard braking, and the brake levers have terrific feel and feedback.

The default setting for the regenerative brake intensity in each of the scooter’s five performance modes is 1, with 5 being the strongest. At intensity level 1, the regen braking is barely perceptible but yet seems effective. By setting it to 0, regenerative braking can be further lowered, but it turns out that regen cannot be completely turned off.

By removing the brake light switches on a racetrack, regenerative braking might be completely eliminated. This method also turns off the brake lights, therefore we don’t advise using it for street riding.

This deck is amazing, never-ending, and gave rise to a totally new perspective.

The deck initially appears to be nothing more than two strips of pre-made grip tape adhered to a matte-black aluminium plate in the style of an extended stop sign. However, everything made sense once the ride began. It certainly helps to have a sturdy place to stand when you press the throttle and feel the

entire ground being pushed backward beneath you. For front-to-back balance, you can spread your feet as widely apart as you like on the spacious deck.

How did it motivate a new perspective? Usually, when I ride, my feet form a “L” shape with the left foot serving as the foundation and the right foot pointing forward at 12 o’clock. The BURN-E deck’s design encouraged me to cant my forward foot so that it points at 11 o’clock, thereby doubling the width of my footprint and considerably enhancing side-to-side stability.

Although they are situated on an angled aluminium plate, the charging ports are just out of reach of being trodden on when riding and are placed just forward of the front foot. Hard to harm but simple to connect in.